DEATH AND TAXES
(Update, Monday 3/27, 7:30pm EST: Both the Wall Street Journal and CBS Marketwatch have stories confirming AppleInsider's account of the tax-driven nature of Steve Jobs' sale, as noted by Zoli Erdos in the comments to his earlier post. No updated story on Apple as yet on The Register's site.)
Before more folks interested in Apple and Apple stock get stressed reading the provocative headline in The Register this morning off memeorandum titled "Jobs Dumps Apple Stock", let me point out the context.
First, the back-story off the Register's inflammatory storyby Andrew Orlowski:
"Apple Computer founder and CEO Steve Jobs sold 45 per cent of his Apple stock this week. Jobs sold 4.57m shares at a price of $64.66, netting him a cool $295m.
Jobs was granted the 10m shares in 2003, but they didn't vest until now.
Jobs retains 120,000 vested stocks that were granted in 1997. Last year, Jobs earned $1 salary from Apple."
The story has some of the facts, but no context and the sub-headine "Vested? Sell!", firmly expressing the editorial viewpoint of the author on this "news".
Now, the context, which ironically is better provided by an internet Apple news site, the AppleInsider:
"He (Jobs) did not sell any of his stake in the company.
In order to meet his tax obligations on the 10M restricted shares, which vested this month, Jobs elected to net-share settle -- essentially allowing Apple to withhold and pay to authorities the portion of the 10M shares that would meet his tax payment requirements.
On March 19 -- the date of the transaction -- this portion amounted to 4,573,553 shares at $64.66 a share, or a whopping $295.7M tax payment. Apple then turned over to Jobs the remaining 5,426,451 shares, which at the close of the market on Friday were worth about $325.4M. The value of the withheld shares ($295.7M) will be turned over to the appropriate tax authorities.
As part of the net-share settlement, Apple will essentially sell, repurchase and then retire the 4,573,553 shares it used to pay Jobs' taxes. These transactions will not represent expenses to the company, but will be accounted for as reductions to cash with corresponding reductions to shareholders' equity.
Therefore, the net-share settlement will have the effect of a share repurchase by the company -- essentially Apple reinvesting in itself, which will reduce the number of outstanding Apple shares on the market."
So, folks, nothing to see here.
Other readers on memeorandum, do not get agitated like our friend Forever Geek here.
This kind of a post by The Register makes me empathize with Scoble's outrage over the reporting from an Australian publication suggesting that 60% of Windows Vista needs to be re-written.
While I continue to be a fan of the Register for tech news, I guess I'll have to read their stuff with a more skeptical eye from now on.
This has been a public service blog post by this author on this beautiful Sunday, wherever you are.
well done
Posted by: howard Lindzon | Sunday, March 26, 2006 at 07:42 PM
Think carefully before you buy into Apple's ipod hype:
Apple don't offer support, they expect the customer to. To top this off, their Indian call centre is inflexible, and they don't either provide training to their support staff, nor supervision.
Just spent about 30 minutes on the line to Apple's Bangalore call centre, talking with Migu.
Unfortunately I was unable to resolve my ipod issue by talking with Migu - Migu's listening skills being poorly lacking. After asking to be put through to his supervisor Shashi, Migu said that this was not possible. Migu also insisted that he was unable to even call his supervisor over to his desk so that he could explain the issue to her. (what's the point in having a supervisor, pray tell?)
I hope that you'll agree that this is unsatisfactory. That Apple's have a call centre in Balgalore is fine - I also employ staff in India myself. That Apple's training and processes are dismal and lead to situations like this happening is deeply saddening.
It has been explained to me by Migu that Apple service centres only take care of hardware issues.
Also that Apple does not take care of software issues, but instead expects customers to take care of their own software issues, whilst being supported by Apple staff members like Migu over the phone. Also, that apple does not compensate customers for having to do their own software repairs.
I think that you should know about this before you consider buying an ipod or any other apple product.
Had I known about this before purchasing my mp3 player, I would have moved on to the competition. My next mp3 player will not be from Apple, and I hope to forewarn many more other unsuspecting would be customers about the above asap to prevent them from making the very bad decision I and my girlfriend have made in purchasing from Apple.
Regards,
Calum
Posted by: Calum Coburn | Monday, March 27, 2006 at 08:02 AM
It's still not obvious to me how this statement can be made: "[Jobs] did not sell any of his stake in the company".
Before this txn, Jobs had exposure to 10 million shares and after it, he has exposure to about 6 million. Also, vesting is normally not a taxable event.
Posted by: pwb | Monday, March 27, 2006 at 01:58 PM
Hello ! This is very [url=http://www.google.com/bb497]good[/url] site !!
Posted by: Hakee | Monday, April 03, 2006 at 09:32 AM
Hello ! This is very [url=http://www.google.com/bb497]good[/url] site !!
Posted by: Arnie | Monday, April 03, 2006 at 09:41 AM
Hi ! Your site is very interesting. Thank you.
Posted by: Arnie | Monday, April 03, 2006 at 09:43 AM
Hello ! This is very [url=http://www.google.com/bb497]good[/url] site !!
Posted by: WebMan | Monday, April 03, 2006 at 09:47 AM